Kasteel de Haar Metal Print
by Elvis Vaughn
Product Details
Kasteel de Haar metal print by Elvis Vaughn. Bring your artwork to life with the stylish lines and added depth of a metal print. Your image gets printed directly onto a sheet of 1/16" thick aluminum. The aluminum sheet is offset from the wall by a 3/4" thick wooden frame which is attached to the back. The high gloss of the aluminum sheet complements the rich colors of any image to produce stunning results.
Design Details
Kasteel de Haar located near Haarzuilens, in the province of Utrecht in the Netherlands. The oldest historical record of a building at the location... more
Ships Within
3 - 4 business days
Additional Products
Metal Print Tags
Photograph Tags
Comments (2)
Artist's Description
Kasteel de Haar located near Haarzuilens, in the province of Utrecht in the Netherlands. The oldest historical record of a building at the location of the current castle dates to 1391. The castle was restored in a project funded by the Rothschild family in the 1890s.
About Elvis Vaughn
I have not added any new work in over two years due to an automobile accident on 12/31/16. I am still recovering from my injuries and have not picked up my camera for the entire two years. I truly hope that my recovery is complete in the near future. Travel and photography allows me to share the beauty of the world God has created. We have so much to be thankful for and just looking around us gives us a reason to praise God for his beauty. Also, I look at photography as a means of helping others with their future. As a student of history it became obvious that our future has been and is a direct response to our pasts. That is why I seem to take shots of historic places throughout Europe and the US. The more we understand that our...
$71.00
Georgia Mizuleva
Wonderful image.
Gerry Bates
Is this Maastricht Castle, or is this Kasteel de Haar? The title and description do not appear to match.
Elvis Vaughn replied:
Thank you for seeing my mistake. I visited both and unfortunately named this one incorrectly. Again, thanks